Accreditation Kashim Ibrahim Library, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria: Challenges and Status

Abstract

This study assesses the accreditation process at Kashim Ibrahim Library, Ahmadu Bello
University, Zaria, focusing on accreditation types, statuses, and challenges. A quantitative
research approach was employed, utilizing structured questionnaires administered to 12
librarians across the university’s satellite libraries that had previously undergone accreditation.
The study identifies three primary accreditation types: program accreditation (33.3%), resource
verification (33.3%), and institutional accreditation (33.3%). Accreditation outcomes show that
47.8% of programs received full accreditation, 34.8% were granted interim status, while 17.4%
were denied due to non-compliance with accreditation requirements. Findings highlight key
challenges affecting accreditation, including lack of current resources (27.8%), inadequate
funding (22.2%), frequent power supply disruptions (25%), and limited technical expertise among
satellite librarians (13.9%). Additionally, 22.5% of accreditation exercises relied on borrowing
resources from individual staff members rather than institutional acquisition, raising concerns
about the sustainability of accreditation readiness. Furthermore, delays in fund release (17.5%)
and insufficient manpower (14.3%) were identified as critical obstacles to meeting accreditation
standards. The study recommends proactive measures such as regular mock accreditation
exercises to identify and address deficiencies before official evaluations. Additionally, the
university administration should prioritize timely funding allocation to support resource
acquisition and infrastructure improvements. Capacity-building programs should also be
implemented to enhance the technical skills of librarians, ensuring they can effectively manage
accreditation requirements. Addressing these challenges will enhance the sustainability and
effectiveness of the accreditation process in the university’s libraries.